Comparison of the advantages between steel structure residence and traditional concrete residence:
|
|
|
|
Strong aseismicity |
Green construction |
Fast construction speed |
Controllable quality, precise size |
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
The total weight of steel material is light, which can effectively reduce the earthquake acting force; long ductility, strong toughness and relatively strong earthquake - resistant performance.
|
Dry construction on site, save water and electricity, small construction covering, little generated dust and other air pollution or noise pollution
|
The components and parts of buildings and residences can be industrially and mechanically produced in large quantities, dry construction on site, assembly operations, without scaffolding, wooden keel, bamboo plywood, or needing worker to bind steel, the multi-layered cross-operation can be made, and construction will not be subject to seasonal and venues effects, therefore, the construction speed is fast. |
The production of steel components is through strict check and testing procedures at the factory, so the quality is balanced and controllable.
|
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
The weight of traditional steel-concrete material is relatively heavy, and the ductility and toughness are also less then steel, comparatively low earthquake-resistant performance. |
Complicated work chain on construction site; large construction covering area; a lot of manpower and resources, and heavy pollution and loud noise. | The components and parts of buildings and residences can not be industrially and mechanized produced, and shall be transferred to site to produce, large amount of scaffolding, wooden keel, bamboo plywood are needed, and also need workers to bind steel, the multi-layer cross-operation can’t be made, and construction will be heavily influenced by the season and site environment, therefore, the construction speed is comparatively slow. | The technology of construction personnel and environment and other factors will have a great impact on the site construction, and the construction is uncontrollable. |
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the advantages between steel structure residence and traditional concrete rdence:
|
|
|
|
||
Recyclable materials can develop sustainable economy |
Reasonable cost |
Flexible design |
Attractive exterior facade appearance |
||
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
Steel structure residence |
||
The construction and remove have minor impact on the environmental pollution and the materials are recycling.
|
On-site employment is about 1/3 of similar steel concrete residence; if the material is standardized and mass produced, the cost will be 10% -15% lower than similar steel concrete residence.
|
Flexible design, load-bearing wall is seldom or no found in the interior. Free design and the possibility of reconstruction is high, the resident can adjust the indoor space as per their own requirement.
|
The exterior design of steel structure residence is modern and flexible, and is subject to structure.
|
||
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
Traditional concrete residence |
||
Recycling rate of material is low and the construction and removal both have great effect on theenvironmental pollution. |
Site construction workers are numerous, so that the human cost is comparatively high; it ishard to estimate the construction material accurately, which cause the high cost. | Design pattern is difficult to change once finalized, the user space is fixed, living comfort degree is limited |
Heavily influenced by technology and structure, etc., hard to break through the form. |
||
|
|
|
|